AI-generated constitutional analysis. Not a legal determination. Methodology →

Trump IExecutive Order 13769

Travel Ban (Muslim-Majority Countries)

January 27, 2017

EO 13769 initially barred entry from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. After legal challenges, a revised version was upheld in Trump v. Hawaii (2018) 5-4. The Establishment Clause challenge argued religious discrimination; due process arguments highlighted lack of individualized review. The majority stressed broad presidential immigration authority and facially neutral language.

Lens Agreement

Broad Consensus

Constitutional tension across 3 dimensions

Constitutional Floor

Tension

CFI Score

46

Mixed

Steelman Defense

+14.3

Stronger defense than consensus

Key Constitutional Issues

Tension Areas

Rights

3 of 5 frameworks identified moderate tension

Equal

3 of 5 frameworks identified moderate tension

Due Process

4 of 5 frameworks identified moderate tension

Dimensional Extremes

Strongest: Sovereignty

Mean score +1.4 5 of 5 lenses scored positively

Weakest: Equal

Mean score -1.4 2 lenses found strong tension

Dimensional Profile

RightsEqualDemocraticSeparationDue ProcessWelfareSovereignty
MeanRange

Dimension Scores by Lens

Rights
-0.6
Equal
-1.4
Democratic
-0.4
Separation
+0.6
Due Process
-1.2
Welfare
-0.2
Sovereignty
+1.4

Scoring Matrix

DimensionTextualistOriginalistDoctrinalistLivingPragmatistSteelman
Rights00-1-1-10
Equal-1-1-1-2-2-1
Democratic000-1-10
Separation+1+100+1+1
Due Process-1-1-1-2-10
Welfare000-100
Sovereignty+2+2+1+1+1+2

Lens Narratives

Click to expand each constitutional lens's reasoning. Case citations are tagged for fidelity.

Steelman Analysis

The President has extraordinarily broad immigration authority. Courts defer to Executive national security judgments. The facially neutral language supports textual validity.

Delta by Dimension

Rights
+0.6
Equal
+0.4
Democratic
+0.4
Separation
+0.4
Due Process
+1.2
Welfare
+0.2
Sovereignty
+0.6

Precedent Anchoring

Anchoring Warning

One or more similar executive orders have a CFI score difference greater than 15 points, suggesting this evaluation may diverge from precedent patterns. Max delta: 17.6 pts.

1 of 5 similar EOs have CFI deltas exceeding 15 points.